use crisesandinstitutionalchange

* The next line produces Table 9.11.

tab2 largeW postlargeW if externalleaderchange == 1, all exact row

* The next line shows changes in S discussed on pp. 452-53.

tab2 S postS if externalleaderchange == 1 &  postlargeW == 0, all exact row

* The next two lines produce Tables 9.12a and 9.12b.

tab2 internalleaderchange postlargeW if largeW == 0 & lose == 1, all exact row
tab2 internalleaderchange postlargeW if largeW == 1 & lose == 1, all exact row

* Cool stuff Bruce cut: The next tables address changes in selection institutions
* by winning leaders.  In the first table, leaders who went to war with a small
* winning coalition are more likely to expand it if they fought for policy aims.
* In the second table, leaders who went to war with a large winning coalition
* are more likely to shrink it to small if they fought for territory.

tab2 territory postlargeW if largeW == 0 & win == 1 & internalleaderchange == 0, all exact row
tab2 territory postlargeW if largeW == 1 & win == 1 & internalleaderchange == 0, all exact row

* More cool stuff Bruce cut: after a draw, states with small winning coalitions
* are more likely to change to large winning coalitions if they remove their
* leader (next line).  After a draw, state with large winning coalitions are
* more likely to shrink to a small winning coalition system if they remove
* their leader.

tab2 internalleaderchange postlargeW if largeW == 0 & draw == 1 & revtype ~= 7, all exact row
tab2 internalleaderchange postlargeW if largeW == 1 & draw == 1 & revtype ~= 7, all exact row

clear
